<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fused Nation - UK SEO Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.fusednation.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) Blog and UK Online Marketing News, Gossip and Rants.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on BigMouthMedia - all talk or deserved success? by Marketing Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/bigmouthmedia-all-talk-or-deserved-success/#comment-38528</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/bigmouthmedia-all-talk-or-deserved-success/#comment-38528</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,

I don't think it's any big secret - check out some business forums and you can get an idea of SEO costs - they can range from anywhere between a few hundred pounds per month to thousands.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s any big secret - check out some business forums and you can get an idea of SEO costs - they can range from anywhere between a few hundred pounds per month to thousands.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BigMouthMedia - all talk or deserved success? by Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/bigmouthmedia-all-talk-or-deserved-success/#comment-38468</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/bigmouthmedia-all-talk-or-deserved-success/#comment-38468</guid>
		<description>I have read this whole post with great delight. There was one point that came out that small agencies need to start to charge the large fees that BMM do..... As an insider what sort of fees are these?? HOW BIG.... surely you can give some guidance on this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read this whole post with great delight. There was one point that came out that small agencies need to start to charge the large fees that BMM do&#8230;.. As an insider what sort of fees are these?? HOW BIG&#8230;. surely you can give some guidance on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no such thing as forum spam by Marketing Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/spam/there-is-no-such-thing-as-forum-spam/#comment-38211</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/spam/there-is-no-such-thing-as-forum-spam/#comment-38211</guid>
		<description>Hi Omadeon, thanks for the kind words!

You bring up an excellent point which I think applies to other areas of the web as well - businesses buying into the "wrong concept" and end up messing things up.  I've seen a few gaming communities literally revolt against the forum admin because they added unsavoury advertising to the forum!  In that case, the community split into groups, some staying with the forum and others leaving to setup their own competing forum.  Actually thinking about it, I've seen similar things happen in SEO communities over the years as well.

That said, if you look at gaming forums as an extreme example - lack of openess and freedom of expression are far from being the problem - in fact, if anything the members are TOO open and express themselves TOO much - to the point that 30 year old men seen to devolve into a something between a virtual version of Lord of the Flies and a Clockwork Orange.

So based on that I would say that to a good extent we have a reasonable ability to express out opinions but as a (virtual) society, many communities still lack the maturity and responsiblity to exercise that right appropriately.

That said, it was immensely stupid for the company you mention to start trying to silence people - they clearly bought the forum over with no idea or experience of how to run a community like that.  It was just a dumbass marketing decision that ended up going sour.  IMO, your friend would be better off starting his own competing forum and inviting as many members to join him as he can!  If you can get even a small group of regular posters to go with you that's the hardest part of setting up and establishing a forum accomplished.

Cheers for th interesting comments!
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Omadeon, thanks for the kind words!</p>
<p>You bring up an excellent point which I think applies to other areas of the web as well - businesses buying into the &#8220;wrong concept&#8221; and end up messing things up.  I&#8217;ve seen a few gaming communities literally revolt against the forum admin because they added unsavoury advertising to the forum!  In that case, the community split into groups, some staying with the forum and others leaving to setup their own competing forum.  Actually thinking about it, I&#8217;ve seen similar things happen in SEO communities over the years as well.</p>
<p>That said, if you look at gaming forums as an extreme example - lack of openess and freedom of expression are far from being the problem - in fact, if anything the members are TOO open and express themselves TOO much - to the point that 30 year old men seen to devolve into a something between a virtual version of Lord of the Flies and a Clockwork Orange.</p>
<p>So based on that I would say that to a good extent we have a reasonable ability to express out opinions but as a (virtual) society, many communities still lack the maturity and responsiblity to exercise that right appropriately.</p>
<p>That said, it was immensely stupid for the company you mention to start trying to silence people - they clearly bought the forum over with no idea or experience of how to run a community like that.  It was just a dumbass marketing decision that ended up going sour.  IMO, your friend would be better off starting his own competing forum and inviting as many members to join him as he can!  If you can get even a small group of regular posters to go with you that&#8217;s the hardest part of setting up and establishing a forum accomplished.</p>
<p>Cheers for th interesting comments!<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no such thing as forum spam by omadeon</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/spam/there-is-no-such-thing-as-forum-spam/#comment-38208</link>
		<dc:creator>omadeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/spam/there-is-no-such-thing-as-forum-spam/#comment-38208</guid>
		<description>Well, this amusing situation reminds me of Nature's tactics: In order to spread their seeds more effectively, trees make tasty fruits. So tomorrow's spammers are likely to make tasty comments, too (to drop the seeds of their links).

Actually, I am commenting here for another reason, not spamming itself. It looks like (although the situation you describe is pretty clear and well-known)... Spammers and spamming tend to obscure other serious problems, that are much more important. E.g. a friend of mine, moderator for a number of years in a very decent forum (about plants and ecology) told me that the whole forum was literally SOLD, to a company nobody has a clue about. That forum's posters and moderators had done a very nice job, dilligently working paylessly to produce worthwhile reading material in their field of interest. The only thing they enjoyed as a reward is freedom of expression and information among them. Now the forum was bought; all the dissident voices were shut down (e.g. anyone speaking positively of businesses the new owners regards as their competitor), and so on.

Spammers are not THE problem. Lack of openness and true freedom of expression, in many cases IS, THE problem - i think.

Best regards, I' ve added you to my blog-roll. Keep the good work goind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this amusing situation reminds me of Nature&#8217;s tactics: In order to spread their seeds more effectively, trees make tasty fruits. So tomorrow&#8217;s spammers are likely to make tasty comments, too (to drop the seeds of their links).</p>
<p>Actually, I am commenting here for another reason, not spamming itself. It looks like (although the situation you describe is pretty clear and well-known)&#8230; Spammers and spamming tend to obscure other serious problems, that are much more important. E.g. a friend of mine, moderator for a number of years in a very decent forum (about plants and ecology) told me that the whole forum was literally SOLD, to a company nobody has a clue about. That forum&#8217;s posters and moderators had done a very nice job, dilligently working paylessly to produce worthwhile reading material in their field of interest. The only thing they enjoyed as a reward is freedom of expression and information among them. Now the forum was bought; all the dissident voices were shut down (e.g. anyone speaking positively of businesses the new owners regards as their competitor), and so on.</p>
<p>Spammers are not THE problem. Lack of openness and true freedom of expression, in many cases IS, THE problem - i think.</p>
<p>Best regards, I&#8217; ve added you to my blog-roll. Keep the good work goind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BBC &#8216;overspends on web portal&#8217; by Digital Rant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keep spending my TV license fee</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/marketing/bbc-overspends-on-web-portal/#comment-38081</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Keep spending my TV license fee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/marketing/bbc-overspends-on-web-portal/#comment-38081</guid>
		<description>[...] BBC Trust has reported that the BBC has spent more than it should on its web portal. Not by a little either, apparently they&#8217;ve overspent by 48% of the baseline budget. As TV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] BBC Trust has reported that the BBC has spent more than it should on its web portal. Not by a little either, apparently they&#8217;ve overspent by 48% of the baseline budget. As TV [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q:  Are keywords in your domain name an important ranking factor? by Johnathan</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37819</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37819</guid>
		<description>"I’d wager that of the top 1000 companies in the world, the vast majority would favour brand.com, over keyword.com"   I think your right they will always prioritise the brand. That IMO is not the mindset that will increase market share with appreciable ROI after all I am suggesting is the brand adds to the portfolio of websites without impacting on the existing brand website, as I said "the keyword domain would be the the main site irrespective of the supply chain multi product branded site, as with baby.com" The keyword would have an authorative website in it's own right creating traffic &#38; sales. As an established site what is the value of Baby.com Baby.co.uk I rest my case.
The short interview with DDB Chairman Emeritus Keith Reinhard mentions ROI in duality terms and mentions the mistakes the agencies made in not understanding the online potential 
http://adage.com/brightcove/lineup.php?lineup=1579871196</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d wager that of the top 1000 companies in the world, the vast majority would favour brand.com, over keyword.com&#8221;   I think your right they will always prioritise the brand. That IMO is not the mindset that will increase market share with appreciable ROI after all I am suggesting is the brand adds to the portfolio of websites without impacting on the existing brand website, as I said &#8220;the keyword domain would be the the main site irrespective of the supply chain multi product branded site, as with baby.com&#8221; The keyword would have an authorative website in it&#8217;s own right creating traffic &amp; sales. As an established site what is the value of Baby.com Baby.co.uk I rest my case.<br />
The short interview with DDB Chairman Emeritus Keith Reinhard mentions ROI in duality terms and mentions the mistakes the agencies made in not understanding the online potential<br />
<a href="http://adage.com/brightcove/lineup.php?lineup=1579871196" rel="nofollow">http://adage.com/brightcove/lineup.php?lineup=1579871196</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q:  Are keywords in your domain name an important ranking factor? by Marketing Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37818</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37818</guid>
		<description>I think you'd have a very hard time persuading any marketing department to priortise a keyword, generic domain over their main brand domain!  Perhaps in some cases where the main brand is a broad company with multiple product lines they might focus on certain keyword domains for certain product lines, but that is going to be the exception rather than the rule.

Even then, it's never going to be a SEO decision - it would be a pure marketing decision (perhaps with some thought on SEO) - and even then, a marketing team will never ditch brand.com because they think keyword.com will rank better on Google!

I'd wager that of the top 1000 companies in the world, the vast majority would favour brand.com, over keyword.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;d have a very hard time persuading any marketing department to priortise a keyword, generic domain over their main brand domain!  Perhaps in some cases where the main brand is a broad company with multiple product lines they might focus on certain keyword domains for certain product lines, but that is going to be the exception rather than the rule.</p>
<p>Even then, it&#8217;s never going to be a SEO decision - it would be a pure marketing decision (perhaps with some thought on SEO) - and even then, a marketing team will never ditch brand.com because they think keyword.com will rank better on Google!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d wager that of the top 1000 companies in the world, the vast majority would favour brand.com, over keyword.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q:  Are keywords in your domain name an important ranking factor? by jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37815</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37815</guid>
		<description>"Operating a secondary site for product lines (e.g. like childrens.co.uk) is very different kettle of fish to starting out with a keyword domain as your core business site" NO the keyword domain would be the the main site irrespective of the supply chain multi product branded site, as with baby.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Operating a secondary site for product lines (e.g. like childrens.co.uk) is very different kettle of fish to starting out with a keyword domain as your core business site&#8221; NO the keyword domain would be the the main site irrespective of the supply chain multi product branded site, as with baby.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q:  Are keywords in your domain name an important ranking factor? by Marketing Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37807</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37807</guid>
		<description>Haha yeh pint sounds good - where you based?

I think we'd differ on the (quite literal!) million pound question - I'd rather spend £5 million on development and marketing than the domain - hell, I'd even be happy to take a new domain name for 6 quid if I couldn't find an existing site to buy over that I like, as long as I had £5 mill to spend on dev, etc.

That's just down to personal preference at the end of day though - if I had £5 million to put into a project, it would likely be something a little bit different so there would be less value in a keyword domain.  Of course if I decided to setup a kick ass online book store that would only ever sell books then keyword domain might be the way to go.  

To be perfectly honest, I think any startup spending serious money on a keyword domain would be a little risky.  The marketing and development work still needs to be done, and any help the keyword domain gives to link building still doesn't ensure top rankings (assuming an "average" business here, not a pro SEO).  Operating a secondary site for product lines (e.g. like childrens.co.uk) is very different kettle of fish to starting out with a keyword domain as your core business site.

Everything in it's place I guess. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha yeh pint sounds good - where you based?</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;d differ on the (quite literal!) million pound question - I&#8217;d rather spend £5 million on development and marketing than the domain - hell, I&#8217;d even be happy to take a new domain name for 6 quid if I couldn&#8217;t find an existing site to buy over that I like, as long as I had £5 mill to spend on dev, etc.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just down to personal preference at the end of day though - if I had £5 million to put into a project, it would likely be something a little bit different so there would be less value in a keyword domain.  Of course if I decided to setup a kick ass online book store that would only ever sell books then keyword domain might be the way to go.  </p>
<p>To be perfectly honest, I think any startup spending serious money on a keyword domain would be a little risky.  The marketing and development work still needs to be done, and any help the keyword domain gives to link building still doesn&#8217;t ensure top rankings (assuming an &#8220;average&#8221; business here, not a pro SEO).  Operating a secondary site for product lines (e.g. like childrens.co.uk) is very different kettle of fish to starting out with a keyword domain as your core business site.</p>
<p>Everything in it&#8217;s place I guess. <img src='http://www.fusednation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q:  Are keywords in your domain name an important ranking factor? by Johnathan</title>
		<link>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37805</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/#comment-37805</guid>
		<description>We should meet up over pint, think it would be a two way curve, which is why I respect you for starting the blog.
I would (if I had it) spend £5m on the right keyword domain  precisely because  it will save me £££££ in marketing brand development costs costs. If having the keyword domain for a big budget marketing department would be a major boon for an established company, it is a fantastic opportunity for a start up !! I mean if I was a multiple retailer such as M&#38;S well known for the childrens products I would continue with the important paid search placement of my brand name and develop a stand alone site for all childrens products under Childrens.co.uk creating further income streams under a category killer domain whilst using my existing inventory but specialising the one product line. IMO generic keyword domains in the hands of an SEO such as you are worth far more than your mindset allows you to see.
I hope the made up words will become brands and evolve into generic brands that warrant copy cats, is that not what we want to achieve. Meanwhile if I can find keywords in any .com or country code in any language that has a population of over 50 m  I will register it, text or verbal instruction we are limited to how we communicate. That was my last post, I can hear the bugle : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should meet up over pint, think it would be a two way curve, which is why I respect you for starting the blog.<br />
I would (if I had it) spend £5m on the right keyword domain  precisely because  it will save me £££££ in marketing brand development costs costs. If having the keyword domain for a big budget marketing department would be a major boon for an established company, it is a fantastic opportunity for a start up !! I mean if I was a multiple retailer such as M&amp;S well known for the childrens products I would continue with the important paid search placement of my brand name and develop a stand alone site for all childrens products under Childrens.co.uk creating further income streams under a category killer domain whilst using my existing inventory but specialising the one product line. IMO generic keyword domains in the hands of an SEO such as you are worth far more than your mindset allows you to see.<br />
I hope the made up words will become brands and evolve into generic brands that warrant copy cats, is that not what we want to achieve. Meanwhile if I can find keywords in any .com or country code in any language that has a population of over 50 m  I will register it, text or verbal instruction we are limited to how we communicate. That was my last post, I can hear the bugle : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
